Sex Descrimination – CFL Web http://cflweb.org/ Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:37:06 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 https://cflweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/default-150x150.png Sex Descrimination – CFL Web http://cflweb.org/ 32 32 NAACP and ACLU Respond to New Iowa Diversity Training Law, State Representative Says Constitution https://cflweb.org/naacp-and-aclu-respond-to-new-iowa-diversity-training-law-state-representative-says-constitution/ https://cflweb.org/naacp-and-aclu-respond-to-new-iowa-diversity-training-law-state-representative-says-constitution/#respond Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:41:25 +0000 https://cflweb.org/naacp-and-aclu-respond-to-new-iowa-diversity-training-law-state-representative-says-constitution/ SIOUX CITY (KTIV) – New Iowa law bans diversity training, implying the US and state are systematically racist in Iowa schools, public universities, and government agencies . Ike Rayford, the NAACP branch chairman in Sioux City, said he believes the law limits the conversations the Iowan should have. He said he feared it was unconstitutional. […]]]>


SIOUX CITY (KTIV) – New Iowa law bans diversity training, implying the US and state are systematically racist in Iowa schools, public universities, and government agencies .

Ike Rayford, the NAACP branch chairman in Sioux City, said he believes the law limits the conversations the Iowan should have. He said he feared it was unconstitutional.

“Diversity training is very important because it allows us to have this conversation. One of the mistakes when we think of diversity, we think of race, but it’s more important than race. It’s age, gender, income, all of those things, ”Rayford said.

The Iowa ACLU issued a statement opposing the law. The statement said, “We condemn the enactment of this harmful and poorly written law. She claims not to limit discussion of racial and gender discrimination, or diversity and inclusion programs. But it then specifically bans discussions of systemic racism and systemic sexism in our society. , institutions and government. “

Rep. Steve Holt, (R) Denison, introduced the bill on the house floor and said he helped draft the majority.

Representative Holt said the law is intended to promote learning for Iowians to judge by a person’s character and not by skin color or gender.

“We are not trampling on free speech rights in any way. I said the bill is very specific. Questions can be answered on this, it can be part of a larger discussion as long as opposing views are being offered, ”said the representative. Steve Holt, (right) Denison.

Holt said that by law critical race theory is not allowed to be taught as part of diversity training at a public university, for example. However, a public university may offer a Critical Race Theory course that students choose to take.

Read the full law here.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/naacp-and-aclu-respond-to-new-iowa-diversity-training-law-state-representative-says-constitution/feed/ 0
SEIU says former human resources director was not fired on medical leave https://cflweb.org/seiu-says-former-human-resources-director-was-not-fired-on-medical-leave/ https://cflweb.org/seiu-says-former-human-resources-director-was-not-fired-on-medical-leave/#respond Thu, 10 Jun 2021 22:11:00 +0000 https://cflweb.org/seiu-says-former-human-resources-director-was-not-fired-on-medical-leave/ Law360 (June 10, 2021, 6:11 p.m. EDT) – The Service Employees International Union has asked a federal judge in Washington, DC, to start the trial of a former human resources manager alleging she was discriminated against and retaliation for taking medical leave, stating the employee did not demonstrate that her termination and leave were related. […]]]>


Law360 (June 10, 2021, 6:11 p.m. EDT) – The Service Employees International Union has asked a federal judge in Washington, DC, to start the trial of a former human resources manager alleging she was discriminated against and retaliation for taking medical leave, stating the employee did not demonstrate that her termination and leave were related.

In a motion to dismiss on Wednesday, the SEIU said former human resources director Tiffany Holodnak had failed to show the type of link between the medical leave she took and her dismissal in 2019 that would support a demand for reprisals under the Family and Medical Leave Act.

“The only fact invoked by the complainant to support a causal link between her leave …

Stay one step ahead

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of prosecution, etc.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, requests, etc.
  • Create personalized alerts for specific case articles and topics and more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/seiu-says-former-human-resources-director-was-not-fired-on-medical-leave/feed/ 0
The company that supports the Keystone XL pipeline officially ceases operations https://cflweb.org/the-company-that-supports-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-officially-ceases-operations/ https://cflweb.org/the-company-that-supports-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-officially-ceases-operations/#respond Wed, 09 Jun 2021 22:37:45 +0000 https://cflweb.org/the-company-that-supports-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-officially-ceases-operations/ Montana Senator Steve Daines announced on Wednesday that the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, Calgary TC Energy, had been forced to formally end the project, and he directly blamed President Joe Biden, who canceled the pipeline on day one. in the office. Bloomberg via Getty Images This week, Daines interviewed Tracy Stone-Manning, Biden’s choice […]]]>


Montana Senator Steve Daines announced on Wednesday that the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, Calgary TC Energy, had been forced to formally end the project, and he directly blamed President Joe Biden, who canceled the pipeline on day one. in the office.

Bloomberg via Getty Images

This week, Daines interviewed Tracy Stone-Manning, Biden’s choice to lead the Bureau of Land Management on several topics, including the Keystone pipeline.

“The president made his decision on the Keystone pipeline and I’m not and shouldn’t be guessing on it,” Stone-Manning said.

“So you’re still against it, though. You opposed it before and you oppose it now, ”Daines asked.

“Senator, again, I will not question the president,” she said.

“I was asking you questions about yourself, however,” Daines repeated. “You have already opposed it. Are you still against it now? “

“Senator, I have served on the board of directors of an organization as a volunteer and, like many organizations, they do a lot of things. Sometimes board members agree, sometimes not.

When asked about the Rock Creek mine project near the Smith River, Daines also took issue with Stone-Manning over her past comments, saying the mine was “philosophically heinous.”

“Do you still think it’s philosophically odious? Your words, ”Daines said. “Did you tell the people of Sanders County and Lincoln County about this?” “

“Senator, I have had long conversations with people on the ground,” Stone-Manning said. “I have had many conversations. I remember talking about giving textbooks to school children. And we have a job to do as Montanais to create well-paid family jobs that come from development that will take care of our environment. And around the time I said I was concerned about some of the hydrological studies and what that would do for the lakes and the wilderness.

“And, have you changed your mind on this?” ” He asked.

Stone-Manning replied, “I haven’t seen the recent studies. It has been years.

Tracy Stone-Manning is a senior advisor to the Montana-based National Wildlife Federation and former chief of staff to Governor Steve Bullock. She previously served as Senator Tester’s senior assistant.

WATCH: Milestones in women’s history since you were born

Women have left their mark on everything from entertainment and music to space exploration, athletics and technology. Each passing year and each new milestone clearly shows how recent this history is compared to the rest of the country, as well as how far we still have to go. The resulting timeline shows that women consistently make the story worthy of top-selling biographies and textbooks; someone just needs to write about them.

Scroll on to find out when women in the United States and around the world won rights, the names of the women who broke the glass ceiling, and the women from which country came together to end a civil war.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/the-company-that-supports-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-officially-ceases-operations/feed/ 0
Woman says Monroe Company has allowed racism and sexual harassment https://cflweb.org/woman-says-monroe-company-has-allowed-racism-and-sexual-harassment/ https://cflweb.org/woman-says-monroe-company-has-allowed-racism-and-sexual-harassment/#respond Wed, 09 Jun 2021 03:39:59 +0000 https://cflweb.org/woman-says-monroe-company-has-allowed-racism-and-sexual-harassment/ MONROE COUNTY, Michigan (FOX 2) – A black woman says her name was the n-word and was even face to face with a swastika, which the company said it would not remove because “it’s a symbol of peace in the world. ancient times”. Monroe County steel company sued by former employee for alleged racist and […]]]>


A black woman says her name was the n-word and was even face to face with a swastika, which the company said it would not remove because “it’s a symbol of peace in the world. ancient times”.

Alicia Harrell is suing Shunli Steel in Monroe County and has hired civil rights attorney Jon Marko to file a lawsuit. He said on Tuesday he was stunned by the things she faced while working for the steel company.

“It is one of the most heinous and offensive forms of discrimination that I have seen,” he said. “She was the victim of horrible racial harassment from her colleagues.”

Marko says his client started working at the factory in September 2019 and was one of the only African Americans to work at the factory. He said she was the only woman of color. During this time, he said she was subjected to offensive treatment from her colleagues.

“It was called quote – the maid, a certified mop pusher, was called the n word,”

Marko says she found a sticker that was left with him saying “Certified Creek Pusher” and a note on his car.

“He said ‘come home n-word b ***** – we don’t want you here”, “said Marko.

He said the harassment extended to his indoor workspace as well.

“Has been branded a monkey and had degrading racist images drawn in her workspace,” Marko said. “She had a swastika … drawn in her workspace too.”

Marko says Herrell complained to management, but he was eventually told they couldn’t substantiate the allegations of racist, sexist abuse and harassment. In fact, he says, their response only made matters worse.

“The management informed her that they were not going to do anything about it and in fact they said – look at that swastika is not that bad – it is a symbol of peace in the olden days,” he said. said Marko.

In August 2020, she quit her job after less than a year. Now she has filed a lawsuit in Wayne County Circuit Court, which includes complaints of hostile work environment, racial discrimination, sex discrimination and implied discharge in violation of Michigan’s Elliot Larsen Civil Rights Act. .

Marko calls this blatant racism – and a blatant attempt to justify it.

“You would expect this stuff to happen in Nazi Germany under the Third Reich – you wouldn’t expect it to happen at someone’s workplace in Michigan in 2021” , said Marko.

FOX 2 has reached out to Shunli Steel for comment on the lawsuit. We have not received a response.

A woman says she was sent this note that says “Come home n-word b ***** – we don’t want you here”, a sticker that says “certified broom pusher”, and a rough drawing of a monkey.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/woman-says-monroe-company-has-allowed-racism-and-sexual-harassment/feed/ 0
DOE to hold public hearings on Trump-Era Title IX rules and protections for LGBTQ + people in schools – Consumer protection https://cflweb.org/doe-to-hold-public-hearings-on-trump-era-title-ix-rules-and-protections-for-lgbtq-people-in-schools-consumer-protection/ https://cflweb.org/doe-to-hold-public-hearings-on-trump-era-title-ix-rules-and-protections-for-lgbtq-people-in-schools-consumer-protection/#respond Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:14:20 +0000 https://cflweb.org/doe-to-hold-public-hearings-on-trump-era-title-ix-rules-and-protections-for-lgbtq-people-in-schools-consumer-protection/ United States: DOE to hold public hearings on Trump-Era Title IX rules and protections for LGBTQ + people in schools June 08, 2021 Ballard Spahr srl To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com. summary The Department of Education (DOE) will hold five days of virtual public hearings on the application of Title […]]]>


United States: DOE to hold public hearings on Trump-Era Title IX rules and protections for LGBTQ + people in schools

To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com.

summary

The Department of Education (DOE) will hold five days of virtual public hearings on the application of Title IX starting June 7. This is part of the DOE’s comprehensive review of its Title IX regulations under the Biden administration’s March 8 decree on Ensure an educational environment free from discrimination based on sex, including sexual orientation or gender identity, which we have already covered here.

The result

  • Educational institutions and other stakeholders should consider participating in future hearings.
  • Upcoming hearings signal that the DOE intends to make swift changes in its application of Title IX, and institutions should keep an eye on DOE guidance and regulatory changes.

The bottom line

Upcoming public hearings will focus on 1) Trump-era amendments to Title IX regulations regarding sexual harassment and 2) discrimination against individuals on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

The Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) previously informed directors of civil rights and attorneys general of federal agencies that anti-LGBTQ + discrimination falls under Title IX protections. Federally funded schools, colleges and universities should review their own anti-discrimination policies and programs and update them accordingly if they have not already done so. Educational institutions should consider participating in upcoming public hearings and also be on the lookout for announcements posted on the Press room section of the DOE website for future notices of proposed regulatory changes.

Lawyers in Ballard Spahr’s Education Industry Group advise schools and universities on a wide range of education law issues, including Title IX compliance.

From June 7 until June 11, the Department of Education (DOE) will hold five days of virtual public hearings on Title IX regulations in general, with particular emphasis on 1) harassment regulations sexuality, including the Trump-era amendments to Title IX regulations (the Trump-era rules) and 2) discrimination against individuals on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in educational environments. These hearings come after President Biden’s March 8 decree (the executive order) requiring the DOE to revise its Title IX regulations.

The ordinance (which we summarized earlier) required the DOE, through Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, in consultation with the Attorney General, to review its existing regulations and other guidelines that might be inconsistent with the stated policy of the Biden administration that “all students should be guaranteed an educational environment free from discrimination based on sex, including discrimination in the form of sexual harassment, which encompasses sexual violence, and including discrimination on the basis of sex on sexual orientation or gender identity. The ordinance mandated a specific review of the Trump-era rules titled “Non-discrimination on the basis of gender in education programs or activities receiving federal funding,” 85 Fed. Reg. 30026 (May 19, 2020). He orders Secretary Cardona to issue new guidelines as needed to implement the ordinance “as soon as possible” and to suspend, revise, cancel – or publish for notice and comment on any proposed rules that suspend, revise or cancel – them. agency actions that are inconsistent with the stated purpose of the Order. The Trump-era rules (which we covered in detail) reduced the behavior that constitutes harassment under Title IX, granted more due process rights to those accused of harassment, and decreased the likelihood that institutions would education are held responsible for sexual harassment.

After the order, the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a three-page memorandum (which we described earlier) confirming that Title IX’s ban on sex discrimination includes the discrimination against individuals on the basis of sexual orientation or gender. identity in the school environment.

DOE public hearings provide the DOE with an opportunity to hear from stakeholders as it revises its bylaws and considers necessary changes in accordance with the ordinance. While the DOE considers changes to Title IX regulations, the Trump-era rules remain in effect.

Individuals or institutions can comment live during public hearings by register here, or submit written comments by email. Written comments should be submitted to T9PublicHearing@ed.gov by 5 p.m. EDT. June 11. Instructions for submitting comments can be found on the public hearing announcement. Ballard Spahr’s Education Industry Group is available to write public comments on behalf of schools and universities interested in sharing their views on Title IX.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: US Consumer Protection

5 stupid things that catch the FTC’s attention

Kronenberger Rosenfeld

The worst nightmare for an affiliate marketer is to wake up in the morning and find that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has shut down your business, raided your offices …

CFPB targets payment processors

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Washington, DC (May 25, 2021) – On March 3, 2021, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) filed a complaint that has significant implications for the payment processing industry.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/doe-to-hold-public-hearings-on-trump-era-title-ix-rules-and-protections-for-lgbtq-people-in-schools-consumer-protection/feed/ 0
Department of Education Begins Radical Overhaul of Title IX Rules on Sexual Misconduct | Education News https://cflweb.org/department-of-education-begins-radical-overhaul-of-title-ix-rules-on-sexual-misconduct-education-news/ https://cflweb.org/department-of-education-begins-radical-overhaul-of-title-ix-rules-on-sexual-misconduct-education-news/#respond Mon, 07 Jun 2021 21:45:00 +0000 https://cflweb.org/department-of-education-begins-radical-overhaul-of-title-ix-rules-on-sexual-misconduct-education-news/ The Education Department began a lengthy job on Monday to rewrite the Title IX campus sexual misconduct rules with a week-long hearing expected to dismantle the Trump administration’s regulations on the landmark civil rights law by gender discrimination and potentially expand its scope. “Students deserve to feel free from gender discrimination in all learning environments,” […]]]>


The Education Department began a lengthy job on Monday to rewrite the Title IX campus sexual misconduct rules with a week-long hearing expected to dismantle the Trump administration’s regulations on the landmark civil rights law by gender discrimination and potentially expand its scope.

“Students deserve to feel free from gender discrimination in all learning environments,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said in a statement on Monday. “These Title IX hearings are an important step in the right direction and an opportunity for us to get your views on this important topic.”

President Joe Biden campaigned to overturn the Title IX rule finalized under the Trump administration last year – a rule that raised the bar of proof for sexual assault and misconduct, has freed schools from investigating on incidents that occur off campus and strengthened the rights of defendants.

The rule, which was aimed at countering an Obama-era directive that pressured schools to lower the bar of proof, sparked an outcry from Democrats, civil rights groups and others working on campus assault issues who said former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’ Title IX rule would catapult students and schools at a time when sexual assault was routinely swept under the rug. The majority of the 124,000 public comments submitted when DeVos first proposed the Title IX rule were opposed to the measure, and once finalized, it sparked dozens of lawsuits, including one involving 17 states and the District of Columbia. .

The president said the rule would “shame and silence survivors” and “give colleges the green light to ignore sexual violence.”

In March, Biden signed an executive order ordering Cardona to suspend, revise, or repeal the DeVos-era rule, or begin the process of collecting feedback to draft a new rule. That process began in earnest on Monday, with department officials blocking out the entire week to hear public comment – the start of a process that many say will dismantle what DeVos considers his most important legacy.

Editorial cartoons on education

“The Biden administration is making this a priority,” said Emily Martin, vice president of education and workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center. “The fact that there are five days of hearings, the fact that the White House launched this process by executive order, really demonstrates the recognition that these issues are essential for the work of the Department of Education in the coming years and we’re really encouraged by that. ”

“We hope this week of hearings will provide lots of opportunities for students who have experienced sexual harassment and assault to tell their stories and share the ways the DeVos Title IX rules have made it harder to feel safe. on campus and placed barriers in how schools respond appropriately to sexual harassment, ”she said.

The kick-off of the week-long hearing brought to light long-standing political and philosophical battles over the issue, with Title IX advocates applauding the start of the process and opponents bracing for an inevitable return of this. which they consider to be hard-earned. due process rights for accused students in the #MeToo era.

In the lead-up to the week-long comment period, Families Advocating for Campus Equality, a nonprofit that advocates “for those affected by unfair disciplinary processes on Title IX campuses,” urged students and their families in an “everyone on the bridge” email. alert to share with the Civil Rights Office why the administration should keep in place due process enacted under DeVos.

Advocates say it’s more than just ping-pong between administrations.

“Since the 1980s, the Civil Rights Office of the Ministry of Education has developed guidelines and tried to guide schools on how to ensure that gender discrimination does not prevent access to education in anyone in federally funded education programs, and works to ensure fairness in the processes associated with it, ”says Sarah Nesbitt, policy and advocacy organizer at Know Your IX. with the Trump administration was a complete reversal of this whole process. “

“What we now envision moving forward is not necessarily a restoration of the exact policies or preferences that were in place previously,” she says, “but rather the continuation of this process of building civil law. solid that Title IX provides and preserving fairness along the way. “

The process comes at a time when the most recent federal data from civil rights data collection shows that incidents of sexual violence in public schools increased by more than half between the 2015-16 school year and the school year 2017-18, and cases of rape or attempted rape almost doubled.

The process also begins at a time when there is more online than sexual misconduct on campus. The Biden administration also signaled its interest in addressing discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation, saying in the announcement to the public comments that it was particularly interested in hearing opinions on the issue. question.

“The attacks on Title IX and the attacks on LGBTQ students have become even more aggressive,” said Martin. “The issues are clearer than ever and the importance of Title IX as basic protection for students against the really related issues – sexual harassment and harassment based on LGBTQ status and gender-based targeting – that for these issues it is clearer than ever how important they are to the well-being of students.

In March, the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice released an interpretation of the 2020 Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, that an employer cannot fire an employee for being gay or transgender. Interpretation extended the rule to schools.

“Having examined the text of Title IX, the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, and the developing jurisprudence in this area, the [Civil Rights] The division determined that the best reading of Title IX’s prohibition of discrimination “on the basis of sex” is that it includes discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation, “reads -on in the note, noting that two appellate courts have reached the same conclusion. .

Interpretation has potentially important ramifications for denominational schools that receive federal funding, including federal assistance. Nearly 30 current and former evangelical college students filed a lawsuit against the education ministry last month, demanding that the religious exemption built into Title IX be declared unconstitutional.

Any future Title IX regulated by the Biden administration could also fit into the latest culture war sweeping through conservative states by considering and passing laws banning transgender students from participating in sports.

In an exclusive interview with ESPN, Cardona said transgender girls have the “right to compete,” and expected the Biden administration to prepare to intervene on their behalf. Currently, eight states prohibit transgender students from participating in women’s and women’s competitions.

“I believe in local control,” he told ESPN. “I believe in state control, but we have a responsibility to protect the civil rights of students. And if we believe that civil rights are being violated, we will act.”



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/department-of-education-begins-radical-overhaul-of-title-ix-rules-on-sexual-misconduct-education-news/feed/ 0
Supreme Court asked if male-only registration project was sex discrimination https://cflweb.org/supreme-court-asked-if-male-only-registration-project-was-sex-discrimination/ https://cflweb.org/supreme-court-asked-if-male-only-registration-project-was-sex-discrimination/#respond Sun, 06 Jun 2021 19:16:28 +0000 https://cflweb.org/supreme-court-asked-if-male-only-registration-project-was-sex-discrimination/ Who are the judges of the Supreme Court? Nine judges make up the Supreme Court, with a chief justice and eight associate judges. WASHINGTON (AP) – The Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether it is gender discrimination for the government to require only men to enroll in the project when they reach the […]]]>


The Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether it is gender discrimination for the government to require only men to enroll in the project when they reach the age of 18.

Whether it is unconstitutional to compel men but not women to register could be seen as having little practical impact. The last time there was any conscription was during the Vietnam War, and the military has been entirely voluntary ever since. But the registration requirement is one of the few places where federal law treats men and women differently, and women’s groups are among those who argue that allowing it is harmful.

Judges could say as early as Monday whether they will hear a case over the Selective Military Service Act, which requires men to register for the project.

Ria Tabacco Mar, director of the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, which urges court to deal with issue, says requiring men to register places “serious burden on men which is not imposed on women “.

Men who do not register may lose their eligibility for student loans and public service jobs, and failure to register is also a felony punishable by a fine of up to $ 250,000 and up to five years. from prison. But Tabacco Mar says the men’s requirement does more than that.

“It also sends a hugely damaging message that women are less able than men to serve their country in this particular way and, conversely, that men are less able than women to stay at home as caregivers in such a way. of armed conflict. We believe these stereotypes demean men and women, ”she said.

Even though the bill is never used again, maintaining the male-only requirement sends a “really damaging message,” said Tabacco Mar, who represents the National Coalition For Men and two individual men challenging the law.

RELATED: Supreme Court dismisses appeal of Johnson & Johnson’s $ 2 billion ovarian cancer talc verdict

A group of retired senior officers and the National Women’s Organization Foundation are among the others urging the court to take up the case.

If the court agrees to hear the case, it would not be a question of whether women should register, but simply whether the current system is constitutional. If not, then it would be up to Congress to decide how to respond, either by passing a law requiring everyone to register, or by deciding that registration is no longer necessary.

The question of who should register for the project has already been submitted to the court. In 1981, the court voted 6-3 to maintain the registration requirement for men only. At the time, the ruling was somewhat aberrant because the court routinely overturned distinctions based on sex in cases involving other areas of law. Many of these cases were brought by the founding director of the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who became a judge in 1993.

The last time the High Court reviewed the Selective Military Service Act, then-judge William Rehnquist explained that the purpose of the recording “was to prepare for a conscription of combat troops.” He said that because women could not serve in combat, the law was not unlawful sex discrimination that violated the Constitution.

But military policy has changed. In 2013, the Defense Ministry lifted the ban on women serving in combat. Two years later, the department said all military roles would be open to women without exception.

Just last year, a congressional committee concluded that “the time has come” to extend the registration requirement to women. “The current disparate treatment of women unacceptably excludes women from a basic civic obligation and reinforces gender stereotypes about the role of women, compromising national security,” the commission said in a report.

The Biden administration is urging judges not to take the case into their own hands and let Congress tackle the problem instead. Lawyers for the administration wrote in a brief that any “re-examination of the constitutionality of the male registration requirement … would be premature at this time” as Congress “is actively considering” the matter.

The Selective Service System, the agency that oversees the registration, said in a statement that it does not comment on pending litigation but is “capable of performing any mission that Congress should mandate.”

If the court agrees to take the case, the arguments would not take place until the fall at the earliest, after the court’s summer recess. The tribunal already has high-profile cases awaiting it then. They include a major challenge to abortion rights and a call to expand gun rights.

The case concerning the project is National Coalition For Men v. Selective Service System, 20-928.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/supreme-court-asked-if-male-only-registration-project-was-sex-discrimination/feed/ 0
Joining the dots between the queen’s racism scandal, Meghan Markle and other despised women https://cflweb.org/joining-the-dots-between-the-queens-racism-scandal-meghan-markle-and-other-despised-women/ https://cflweb.org/joining-the-dots-between-the-queens-racism-scandal-meghan-markle-and-other-despised-women/#respond Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:30:00 +0000 https://cflweb.org/joining-the-dots-between-the-queens-racism-scandal-meghan-markle-and-other-despised-women/ One of the main claims the Queen has made by her admirers is that she never complains. It is true that we never hear him complain publicly, but it is one of the privileges of the very powerful. Complaints are for the losers; better bypass the complaints process and invisibly bend the system to your […]]]>


One of the main claims the Queen has made by her admirers is that she never complains. It is true that we never hear him complain publicly, but it is one of the privileges of the very powerful. Complaints are for the losers; better bypass the complaints process and invisibly bend the system to your liking.

Illustration: Reg Lynch Credit:

Australians stranded in India complain about Australia’s travel ban; politicians and celebrities who escape the ban are not. They are aboard their private jets, soon greeted at customs via the VIP entrance, where a smile is friendly to them, and without a queue.

We also often hear that it is unfair to attack the queen because she cannot defend herself. I don’t know of any rule preventing the Queen from speaking, and anyway she seems to be sending out a lot of press releases lately. But the idea here, I think, is that the Queen and the Royal Family have taken an oath of some kind of omerta, a blood oath of silence and solidarity that they are required to honor.

In that sense, they really look like the Mafia – their distrust of foreigners, their refusal to cooperate with the authorities, the way they slide a protective iron beam around one of their accused of wrongdoing (Prince Andrew, where have you been?)

It was precisely this omerta that Megan and Prince Harry broke, as Harry’s mother did before them. For this, they have been called egocentric and selfish. Maybe they are; that’s not to say the royals aren’t so racist.

Would it be so surprising if that was the case? It wasn’t until 2011 that the Queen changed the inheritance laws so that a little girl (Princess Charlotte) didn’t lose her place in the inheritance hierarchy when a younger brother was born. This was about a century after England granted women the same property rights as men.

Loading

Meghan has been blunt in her criticisms of the Windsors. She has spoken openly about her own declining sanity while cooking in the Royal Woman’s pressure cooker.

This week, tennis player Naomi Osaka refused to participate in post-match press conferences at Roland Garros, then withdrew from competition altogether, citing mental health reasons. She was labeled brattish.

I am really interested in what the critics of these young women would like them to do.

Loading

Is it because they don’t believe women’s reports about their own mental anguish? Meghan said she was suicidal, Osaka said she suffered from severe bouts of depression, and here in Australia, Brittany Higgins was hospitalized for mental health reasons due to the huge toll of her alleged rape.

Or are the critics willing enough to believe that women are suffering, but would rather be silent about it? Are they liars or just guilty of the offense of open complaint?

All of these women fell under the spell of the institutions they once enthusiastically joined, and I suspect that’s a big part of their offense: the accusation that they knew what they were getting themselves into.

It doesn’t matter if you blame the victim. Imagine being so intellectually lazy that you cannot imagine that a person could act in good faith out of ignorance, only to find themselves in an unexpectedly intolerable position.

Perhaps it is just that institutions, and the men who run them for the most part, find it difficult to conceive that bravery can coexist with vulnerability.

They will say that politics is a tough game, or that Meghan knew full well who she was marrying, and that elite sport is not for the faint of heart or the faint of heart. While expressing, of course, his sympathy and best wishes for the recovery of these women from their emotional problems.

The only difference between the way these institutions acted historically and the way they act now is that they now have to pretend to care about the young women they trample on. Which somehow worsens the trampling.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the most important and interesting stories, analysis and ideas of the day. register here.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/joining-the-dots-between-the-queens-racism-scandal-meghan-markle-and-other-despised-women/feed/ 0
Carol E. Gordon | Obituary https://cflweb.org/carol-e-gordon-obituary/ https://cflweb.org/carol-e-gordon-obituary/#respond Sat, 05 Jun 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://cflweb.org/carol-e-gordon-obituary/ Dr. Carol E. Gordon, of Pullman, passed away peacefully on Saturday, May 29, 2021, at the age of 95 in Bishop Place. Carol was born in Lynn, Mass., And, after her mother died in childbirth, was raised in Goffstown, NH, by her grandparents, Charles and Isabella Ray, and her aunt, Carolyn Worden. Carol enjoyed following […]]]>


Dr. Carol E. Gordon, of Pullman, passed away peacefully on Saturday, May 29, 2021, at the age of 95 in Bishop Place.

Carol was born in Lynn, Mass., And, after her mother died in childbirth, was raised in Goffstown, NH, by her grandparents, Charles and Isabella Ray, and her aunt, Carolyn Worden. Carol enjoyed following Grandpa Charlie as their horse, Chubby, pulled the butcher’s cart along the delivery route. Her grandparents on the Gordon side owned an apple orchard nearby, and she was the leader of a team of her childhood friends whom her grandfather swore to be the best apple picking team he ever had. . Carol was a violinist in her high school orchestra and played on the girls’ basketball team, dismaying opposing teams with the precision of her two-handed catch.

After graduating from Goffstown High School as a valedictorian, she attended Oberlin College, where she graduated from Phi Beta Kappa in 1948. Carol taught in the physical education department at the University of the New Hampshire from 1948 to 1954, then to the University of Utah, where she chaired the Division of Physical Education for Women while earning her doctorate. in educational / counseling psychology. In 1961, she completed her doctorate. and was also named Faculty Woman of the Year.

During those years in Utah, Carol took every opportunity to take advantage of her remarkable downhill skiing skills on the slopes of Alta. From Utah, she moved to Washington State University to become professor and chair of the Department of Physical Education for Women, a position she held from 1962 until her retirement in 1983. La Carol’s teaching specialty was sports psychology, and in 1968 she was honored as the WSU Faculty Woman of the Year. She chaired the committee that oversaw the design and construction of the WSU physical education building. She also coached the women’s field hockey and tennis teams until 1966 and was director of women’s sports from 1962 to 1975. Carol was inducted into the WSU Track and Field Hall of Fame in 2004.

Among her many roles in professional organizations, Carol has served as president of the Washington Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation and of the Western Society for Physical Education for College Women. In 1973-1974, Carol was president of the Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women (AIAW) which, as the female equivalent of the NCAA, functioned as the national governing body for intercollegiate women’s athletics from 1972. to 1982.

In her role as AIAW’s second president, Carol was instrumental in determining how the new Title IX law prohibiting gender discrimination in educational institutions would be interpreted as applying to athletics. female interuniversity. Its influence was documented in a book on the history of Title IX in varsity sports written by a former WSU doctoral student. It was also featured in a 2009 book by Richard Lapchick titled “100 Trailblazers: Great Women Athletes who Opened Doors for Future Generations”. In 1998, the National Association of Collegiate Women Athletic Administrators honored Carol with her Lifetime Achievement Award. For her significant contributions to the WSU and to the growth of athletic opportunities for girls and women, Carol was commemorated with a plaque engraved on the Pullman Walk of Fame in downtown Pullman.

While she was president of the AIAW, Carol was invited by the NCAA to attend a meeting with prominent male coaches and NCAA administrators focused on resolving serious disagreements over how to implement the title. IX, for example whether football should be included in the equity equation. Apparently, famous football player and high-profile athletic director Elroy “Crazy Legs” Hirsch did not approve of gender equality in college sports, and (as the only woman present) Carol regularly and graciously confronted him. . Penn State football coach Joe Paterno spoke up in support, telling Hirsch times have changed. To this day, friends wonder if the pink pantsuit Carol wore to the reunion (because it was her favorite color!) Helped or hinder the cause.

Carol was a strong supporter of the Pullman community – favorites included the Regional Theater of the Palouse, Washington / Idaho Symphony, WSU Museum of Art, and Pullman Regional Hospital. Additionally, thanks to his generosity and that of longtime companion Dr. Mary Lou Enberg, the WSU Sports Management Program hosts the annual Gordon / Enberg Lecture Series in Sports Studies.

One of Carol’s special gifts was her ability to bring out the best in everyone around her. Believing the best in each person, she inspired them to believe that they could accomplish more than they ever thought possible. Countless alumni and faculty colleagues have kept in touch with Carol over the years, expressing gratitude for her leadership, thoughtful guidance and the profound impact she has had on their lives and careers. To all of her many friends, know that your friendship was her greatest treasure. To our dear Carol, our hearts will be forever blessed by the memory of your beautiful smile.

Honoring Carol’s request, there will be no memorial service. She was buried in Pullman Cemetery. Kimball Funeral Home of Pullman was responsible for the arrangements. Those wishing to donate in her memory can send contributions to: Alternatives to Violence of the Palouse, PO Box 37, Pullman, WA, 99163 (509-332-0552), or the Women’s Sports Foundation at womenssportsfoundation.org. Online condolences can be sent to kimballfh.com.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/carol-e-gordon-obituary/feed/ 0
Brittany Higgins hospitalized and supported “after months of political pressure” | australian politics https://cflweb.org/brittany-higgins-hospitalized-and-supported-after-months-of-political-pressure-australian-politics/ https://cflweb.org/brittany-higgins-hospitalized-and-supported-after-months-of-political-pressure-australian-politics/#respond Thu, 03 Jun 2021 22:57:00 +0000 https://cflweb.org/brittany-higgins-hospitalized-and-supported-after-months-of-political-pressure-australian-politics/ Brittany Higgins was hospitalized to preserve her mental well-being after months of scrutiny following her explosive allegation that she was raped by a colleague in Parliament in 2019. The former Liberal worker, who sparked a #MeToo moment in Australia’s parliament, was admitted to hospital last Thursday evening to address serious concerns about her well-being. Higgins’ […]]]>


Brittany Higgins was hospitalized to preserve her mental well-being after months of scrutiny following her explosive allegation that she was raped by a colleague in Parliament in 2019.

The former Liberal worker, who sparked a #MeToo moment in Australia’s parliament, was admitted to hospital last Thursday evening to address serious concerns about her well-being. Higgins’ partner David Sharaz told Guardian Australia she was recovering “and receiving the support she needed after months of sustained political pressure.”

The hospitalization follows a string of harrowing events, including the tabling in Parliament of a report by Scott Morrison’s chief of staff assessing whether members of the Prime Minister’s media office had a negative track record about Higgins and her partner after the rape allegation became public. There were also fifteen days of Senate hearings on the estimates which gave rise to new revelations.

Higgins remains engaged with the Australian Federal Police and it will be known in a few weeks whether his sexual assault complaint will be prosecuted.

AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw told a Senate committee last week that “an evidentiary package should be provided to the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions in the coming weeks.”

An evidence package is sent to prosecutors if investigators consider that enough evidence has been gathered to support a criminal charge.

At the same hearing, police revealed that 19 other allegations of misconduct involving parliamentarians, their staff or “official establishments” had been brought to their attention since the former Liberal staff member was made public.

Higgins was involved in the investigation led by Morrison’s chief of staff, John Kunkel, into the alleged background to him and Sharaz, and as a preliminary to a separate investigation by Phil Gaetjens, the secretary of the Department of Prime Minister. and Cabinet.

Kunkel ultimately declined to conclude that the prime minister’s office informed Sharaz, citing a lack of first-hand evidence and the seriousness of the allegation.

Morrison’s chief of staff concluded that he was “unable to conclude that the alleged activity had taken place” but warned that “the fact that these allegations were made serves as an important reminder of the need to [the prime minister’s] staff to adhere to the highest standards ”.

Sharaz, a journalist and former civil servant, later called Kunkel’s report an exercise for “PMO staff members protecting themselves.”

The Gaetjens Inquiry is an audit of communications between staff in the Prime Minister’s Office and Higgins prior to February 2021, when the story of the rape allegation came to light by news.com.au.

Morrison called for an investigation because there were different accounts of who knew what when regarding the sexual assault allegation. Morrison insisted that he and his office were unaware of the rape allegation until February 2021, even though a number of senior government officials were aware of Higgins’ account of events.

It’s unclear when Gaetjens will complete his investigation, although Morrison’s department head has signaled that it will be in a few weeks, not months.

It is also unclear whether the report Gaetjens is preparing for Morrison will ever be made public. In an appearance before a Senate committee, Gaetjens abstained on the grounds that it was Morrison’s report, not his.

Higgins met Morrison in late April. Morrison reported at the end of March that he would meet with her privately after she filed a formal complaint with Kunkel about the alleged background, but the meeting did not take place until a month later.

During the meeting, Higgins urged the Prime Minister to “show leadership” to bring about a cultural change in the Australian parliament and protect political staff from predatory behavior in the workplace.

Higgins alleges that she was raped by a colleague in March 2019 in the Parliament office of her then employer Linda Reynolds, who held the defense industry portfolio at the time.

Higgins telling his story publicly has already sparked significant reactions. Australian Gender Discrimination Commissioner Kate Jenkins has been asked by the government to investigate parliamentary culture at work, and Morrison has signaled the establishment of an independent complaints process for serious incidents in the Parliament.

The Liberal staff member who allegedly raped Higgins in 2019 only saw his job terminated 10 days after leaving Reynolds office. The official termination date appeared in responses to questions on notice provided by the finance ministry after the Senate’s last round of estimates at the end of March.

In Australia, the crisis assistance service Safety rope is 13 11 14.



Source link

]]>
https://cflweb.org/brittany-higgins-hospitalized-and-supported-after-months-of-political-pressure-australian-politics/feed/ 0